Inadequacy of the RF Federal Laws and Normative Documents in the Absence of a List of “Objects of Protection” under Dangerous Natural and Anthropogenic Effects

Number of journal: 4-2018
Autors:

Maslyaev A.V.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2018-4-44-48
УДК: 699.841

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
Each Federal Law and normative document of the Russian Federation has a “terms and definitions” section which presents special terms with an explanation of their concepts. The meaning of these terms is in the explanation of their contents. But the analysis of main terms in the RF federal documents of a construction content shows that in the presence of the list of effects of dangerous natural and anthropogenic phenomena at the territory of Russia, the main list of “objects of protection” for which they are all developed is absent. The article presents the list of “objects of protection” under effects of dangerous natural and anthropogenic phenomena for including it as a separate paragraph of the RF Federal Law.
1. Ulomov V.I, Shumilina L.S. Komplekt kart oshhego sejsmicheskogo rajonirovanija territorii Rossijskoj Federacii OSR-97 [The Complete set of cards of the general seismic division into districts of territory of Russian Federa-tion ОСР-97]. Moscow: Оb’edinennyi institut fiziki zemli im. O.Yu. Shmidta. 1999. 57 р.
2. Masljaev A.V. Increase in the Loss of Health of the Population in Buildings During EarthquakeS in Federal Laws and Normative Documents of the Russian Federation. Zhilischnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2017. No. 4, pp. 43–47. (In Russian).
3. Masljaev A.V. The analysis of the paradigm of the joint venture 14.13330.2014 on maintenance of seismoprotection of buildings of the raised responsibility at earthquake. Zhilischnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2015. No. 8, pp. 51–55. (In Russian).
4. Aruin A.S., Zatsiorsky B. M. Ergonomicheskaya biomehanika [The Ergonomic biomechanics]. Мoscow: Ergonomicheskayа biomehanika. 1989. 256 p.
5. Masljaev A.V. Seismic stability of buildings and human health. Zhilischnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2007. No. 5, pp. 23–24. (In Russian).
6. Masljaev A.V. Action of the population of Russia in aseismic buildings in case of an earthquake. Zhilischnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 11, pp. 44–47.(In Russian).
7. Masljaev A.V. Analys of conformity of federal laws and standard documents of the Russian Federation of the building maintenance to requirements of the constitution of the Russian Federation. Zhilischnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2016. No. 11, pp. 38–43. (In Russian).
8. Maslyaev A.V. Seismic protection of settlements of Russia with due regard for «unpredictability of the next dangerous natural phenomenon». Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2017. No. 11, pp. 43–47. (In Russian).
9. Maslyaev V.N. The building system of Volgograd oblast ignores protection of life of people in buildings at earthquake. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 1–2, pp. 66–68. (In Russian).

For citation: Maslyaev A.V. Inadequacy of the RF Federal Laws and normative documents in the absence of a list of “objects of protection” under dangerous natural and anthropogenic effects. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 4, pp. 44–48. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2018-4-44-48


Print   Email