Retrospective Analysis of the Geotechnical Situation when Diagnosing Causes of Development of Emergency Deformations of Stadium Structures

Calculations of interaction of the bases and facilities with due regard for nonlinear operation of materials and soils is a prospect for development of design business in any country of the world. Complex engineering and geological conditions, new architectural forms with non-obvious stress distribution in structures, development of underground space require designers to analyze the spatial work of structures together with the base. In particular, the implementation of joint calculations is relevant when analyzing the causes of defects in already built buildings, preventing emergencies. It is the analysis of the joint work of the spatial structure with the base that makes it possible to accurately determine the cause of defects development and offer adequate stabilization measures to the situation. On the example of an emergency building, the article illustrates the use of numerical joint calculations as an apparatus for retrospective analysis of the development of geotechnical situation and the basis for making technical decisions to strengthen structures or foundations.

V.A. SHASHKIN, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), Deputy General Director
N.A. EVSEEV, Engineer (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

OOO «PI Georeconstruction» (4, Izmaylovsky Avenue, Saint-Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation)

1. Ulitsky V.М., Shashkin А.G., Shashkin K.G, Shashkin  V.А. The basics of soil-structure interaction calculations. Saint-Petersburg: Georeconstructsia. 2014. 328 p.
2. Gorbunov-Posadov M.I. On joint work of foundations and structures. General reports of the VIII International Congress on soil mechanics and Foundation construction. Moscow: Stroizdat. 1973. C. 32–82. (In Russian).
3. Shashkin V.A. Effects of stress concentration in building structures in interaction with the base. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2012. No. 9, pp. 9–14. (In Russian).
4. Katzenbach R. Basic principles of design and monitoring of high-rise buildings in Frankfurt am main. Cases from practice. Rekonstruktsiya gorodov i geotekhnicheskoe stroitel’stvo. 2005. No. 9, pp. 80–99. (In Russian).
5. Ulitsky V.M., Shashkin A.G., Shashkin K.G. Geotehnicheskoe soprovogdenie stroitelstva gorodov [Geotechnical support of urban development]. St. Petersburg: Georeconstruction. 2010. 551 p.
6. Shashkin A.G. Proektirovanie zdaniy i podzemnyh sooruzheniy v slozhnyh inzhenerno-geologicheskih usloviyah Sankt-Peterburga [Design of buildings and underground structures in complex engineering and geological conditions of St. Petersburg]. Moscow: Geomarketing. 2014. 352 p.
7. Babanov V.V., Evseev N.A. Appointment of rigidity parameters of reinforced concrete structures in finite element calculations of structures. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2017. No. 12, pp. 26–29. (In Russian).
8. Evseev N.A. Features of the account of nonlinear work of reinforced concrete in calculations of interaction of a building and the basis. Geotehnika. 2018. No. 4, pp. 58–69. (In Russian).
9. Nesvetaev G.V., Khalezin S.V. The deformation properties of concrete with contact structure of coarse aggregate. Naukovedenie. 2015. No. 4, pp. 11–13. (In Russian).
10. Evseev N.A. Accounting of physical nonlinearity of reinforced concrete structures at computation of structural systems. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2017. No. 5, pp. 66–70. (In Russian).
11. Salman Mohammed M., The Ratio between Static and Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity in Normal and High Strength Concrete. Journal of Engineering and Development. 2006. Vol. 10. No. 2, pp. 163–174.
12. Lydon F.D., Balendran R.V. Some Observations on Elastic Proper-ties of Plain Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 1986. Vol. 16. No. 3, pp. 312–324.