Protection of Localities in Hazardous Natural Phenomena is the Main Purpose of the Russian Construction System

Currently, approximately 95% of the Russian population lives in settlements. Meanwhile, many settlements in Russia are flooded almost every year. The reasons for the vulnerability of settlements from dangerous natural impacts are substantiated: settlements are not recognized in federal laws and regulatory documents of the Russian Federation of construction content as capital construction objects; the most massive residential and public buildings of settlements are calculated for minimal impacts of natural hazards. It is proposed in the sanitary norms of CH 2.2.4/2.1.8.566–96 to provide maximum permissible values of logarithmic levels of vibration velocities in the structures of the first floors of residential and public buildings during an earthquake: at 7-point seismic impact Lv≤90 dB; with 8-point seismic impact Lv≤100 dB; at a 9-point seismic impact – Lv≤110 dB. In GOST 31937–2011 “Buildings and structures. Rules of inspection and monitoring of technical condition” it’s necessary to provide for an acceptable level of federal individual risk equal to R_risk=10^-8 with an average repeatability of federal earthquakes of 50 years.

A.V. GINZBURG¹, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering);
A.V. MASLYAEV², Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

¹ Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research) (26, Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow 129337, Russian Federation)
² Seismic Research Laboratory (27, bildg. A, rm, 51, Zemlyachki Street, Volgograd, 51400117, Russian Federation)

1. Maslyaev A.V. Construction system of Russia does not protect the life and health view of people in settlements during the earthquake. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 9, pp. 60–63. (In Russian).
2. Umnyakova N.P., Shubin I.L. To the problem of revising SP 131.13330 “Construction climatology” in a changing climate. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2021. No. 6, pp. 3–10. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-6-3-10
3. Hhain V.E., Lomize M.G. Geotectonika sosnovami geodinamici [Geotectonika with geodynamics bases]. Moscow: MSU. 1995. 480 p.
4. Yudakhin F.N., Shchukin Yu.K., Makarov V.I. Glubinnoe stroenie i sovremennye geodinamicheskie protsessy v litosfere Vostochno-Evropeeikoi platform [Deep structure and modern geodynamic processes in a lithosphere of the East European platform]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN. 2003. 300 p.
5. Maslyaev A.V. Russian settlements are not protected against the impact of natural hazards. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2019. No. 5, pp. 36–42. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-5-36-42
6. Ginzburg A.V., Kagan P.B. CAD of the construction organization. SAPR i grafika. 1999. No. 9, pp. 32–34. (In Russian).
7. Maslyaev A.V. Author’s paradigm of the Russia construction system. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1–2, pp. 65–71. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-65-71
8. Composition of the Building Standard Law of Japan. Tokyo: 1987. 29 p.
9. Maslyaev A.V. About the safety of mass residential and public buildings in Case of dangerous natural influences. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2021. No. 1–2, pp. 40–49. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-1-2-40-49
10. Koff G.L., Ryumina E.V. Seismicheskii risk (vidy, otsenka, upravlenie) [Seismic risk (types, assessment, management). Moscow: Polteks. 2003.108 p.
11. Skiba A.A., Ginzburg A.V. Risk analysis in an investment and construction project. Vestnik MGSU. 2012. No. 12, pp. 276–281. (In Russian).
12. Ginzburg A.V., Ryzhkova A.I. Intensification of the development of energy efficient technologies, taking into account organizational and technological reliability. Scientific Review. 2014. No. 7, pp. 276–280. (In Russian).
13. Ginzburg A.V., Ryzhkova A.I. Possibilities of artificial intelligence to improve the organizational and technological reliability of construction production. Vestnik MGSU. 2018. Vol. 13. Iss. 1 (112), pp. 7–13. (In Russian).
14. Maslyaev A.V. Need to establish regional research centers to protect construction objects from the effects of natural hazards. Zhilischnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 4–5, pp. 56–63. (In Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-4-5-56-6
15. Novyy katalog sil’nykh zemletryaseniy na territorii SSSR s drevneyshikh vremen do 1975 g. [New catalog of strong earthquakes on the territory of the USSR from ancient times to 1975]. Moscow: Nauka. 1977. 536 p.
16. Korchinsky I.L., Borodin L.A., Grossman B.A. and others. Seysmostoykoye stroitel’stvo zdaniy [Earthquake – resistant construction of buildings]. Moscow: Vyshaya shkola. 1971. 320 p.
17. Polyakov S.V. Seysmostoykiye konstruktsii zdaniy [Earthquake-resistant structures of buildings]. Moscow: Vyshaya shkola. 1969. 336 p.
18. Maslyaev A.V. Russian construction system does not recognize the impact of repeated earthquakes on construction sites. American Scientific Journal. 2020. No. 38, pp. 41–49. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31618/asj.2707-9864.2020.1 / 38/12
19. Maslyaev A.V. Account of buildings and structures for preserving of life and health of the people an earthquake. Zhilischnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2009. No. 8, pp. 33–35. (In Russian).
20. Maslyaev V.N. Impact of vibrations of structures of buildings during an earthquake on the reaction of people. Construction and architecture. Series 14. Construction in special conditions. Earthquake resistant construction. Moscow: VNIIIS Gostroy USSR. 1987. IS-SUE 6, pp. 18–23. (In Russian).
21. Maslyaev A.V. Seismozashchita zdanii v naselennykh punktakh dlya sokhraneniya zhizni i zdorov’ya lyudei pri zemletryasenii [Seismic protection of buildings in settlements to preserve the life and health of people during an earthquake]. Volgograd: VolgSTU. 2018. 149 p.