Conceptual Model for Assessing the Accessibility of Objects of Architectural Heritage of Kuban

The uniqueness of Kuban as a specific historical and cultural territory of Russia is noted. A conceptual model formed in the process of generalizing the spiritual and cognitive needs of an individual in the cultural environment of the region is presented. A logical algorithm has been compiled that determines the degree of accessibility of architectural heritage objects. A linear algorithm has been compiled that determines the degree of accessibility of architectural heritage objects. Specific elements characterizing this accessibility and taking into account the current dynamics of innovative technologies are taken as the calculation criterion. The possibility of using a conceptual model on the example of the object of the architectural heritage of the Kuban – the Ascension Church in the village of Plastunovskaya of the Krasnodar Territory is indicated. The architectural features of the temple architecture monument under consideration are revealed. Attention is focused on the preservation of regional identity, historical continuity, which are valuable and cultural guidelines for education and transmission to present and future generations. The practical application of the presented model equally contributes to the development of educational tourism.

O.S. SUBBOTIN, Doctor Architecture, (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin (13, Kalinin Street, Krasnodar, 350044, Russian Federation)

1. Lokotko A.I. Istoriko-kul’turnyye landshafty Belarusi [Historical and cultural landscapes of Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusskaya nauka. 2006. 470 p. (In Russian).
2. Subbotin O.S. [Innovative materials and technologies in public buildings in Sochi. Zhilishnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing construction]. 2016. No. 11, pp. 29–34. (In Russian).
3. Utrachennyye khramy Sankt-Peterburga. Opyt arkhitekturnoy rekonstruktsii [Lost temples of St. Petersburg. Experience in architectural reconstruction]. Auth.-composition. S.V. Sementsov. St. Petersburg: Publishing House IP E.A. Petelina. 2021. 200 p. (In Russian).
4. Subbotin O.S. Temple architecture of the Kuban and cultural borrowing of Slavic-Byzantine traditions. Zhilishnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing construction]. 2012. No. 1, pp. 45–47. (In Russian).
5. Pluzhnikov V.I. Tipologiya ob’’yemnykh kompozitsiy v kul’tovom zodchestve kontsa ХVII – nachala ХХ v. na territorii Bryanskoy oblasti [Typology of three-dimensional compositions in religious architecture of the late 17-th – early 20-th century on the territory of the Bryansk region]. Monuments of Russian architecture of monumental art. Style, attribution, dating. Moscow: Nauka. 1983, pp. 157–198. (In Russian).
6. Kirichenko E.I. Russkaya arkhitektura 1830-kh – 1910-kh godov [Russian architecture of the 1830-y – 1910-y]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 1978. 400 p. (In Russian).
7. Orelskaya O.V. Nizhny Novgorod architectural school at the turn of the century. Baikal project. 2020. V. 17. No. 64, pp. 42–51. (In Russian).
8. Subbotin O.S. Monuments of the architectural heritage of Tobolsk. Zhilishnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing construction]. 2011. No. 10, pp. 48–50. (In Russian).
9. Subbotin O.S., Khritankov V.F. Effective use of energy-saving structures and materials in low-rise residential buildings. Zhilishnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing construction]. 2008. No. 12, pp. 20–23. (In Russian).
10. Shamruk A.S. Arkhitektura Belarusi ХХ – nachala ХХI v.: Evolyutsiya stiley i khudozhestvennykh kontseptsiy. [Architecture of Belarus in the 20-th – early 21-th centuries: Evolution of styles and artistic concepts]. Minsk: Belarusskaya nauka. 2007. 335 p. (In Russian).
11. Slavina T.A. Issledovateli russkogo zodchestva. Russkaya istoriko-arkhitekturnaya nauka ХVIII – nachala ХХ veka [Researchers of Russian architecture. Russian historical and architectural science of the 18-th – early 20-th centuries]. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press, 1983. 192 p. (In Russian).