The Need to Recognize the Settlements of Russia as Objects of Capital Construction

Mathematical calculations of risks in natural hazards show that their magnitude depends mainly on such factors as “a large number of people in buildings”. “large scale” and “maximum intensity” of these impacts. Currently, humanity is building mainly settlements with a large number of people. Therefore, in order to determine the real values of risks under hazardous natural impacts for settlements, builders are forced to recognize them as capital construction objects. It is known that in world practice, when calculating capital buildings and structures of settlements, the maximum effects of natural hazards are used. However, the building system of Russia does not recognize settlements as capital construction objects, which makes it possible even the most massive residential and public buildings in settlements to count only on minimal hazardous natural impacts, but this does not protect these buildings and people from probable maximum impacts.

A.V. MASLYAEV, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Research Seismic Laboratory (27, bldg. A, 51, Zemlyachki Street, 400117, Volgograd, Russian Federation)

1. Maslyaev A.V. Russia settlements are not protected against the impact of natural hazards. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2019. No. 5, pp. 36–42. (In Russian). DOI: https: /doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-5-36-42
2. Maslyaev A.V. Construction system of Russia does not protect the life and health view of people in settlements during the earthquake. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 9, pp. 60–63. (In Russian).
3. Aktikaev F.F., Maslyaev A.V. Protection of life and health of people is not recognized as the main goal in the construction of buildings in Russia. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing construction]. 2019. No. 11, pp. 58–64. (In Russian). DOI: https:/doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-11-58-64
4. Maslyaev A.V. Protection of Russia settlements against effect of dangerous natural phenomena Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 4, pp. 40–43. (In Russian).
5. Maslyaev A.V. Analysis of provisions of the RF Federal Laws and normative documents concerning the use of the RF maps of on the seismic hazards (OSR-2015) in construction. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2016. No. 8, pp. 3–8. (In Russian).
6. Maslyaev A.V. Seismic protection of settlements of Russia with due regard for “UnCpredictability of the next dangerous natural phenomenon”. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2017. No. 11, pp. 43–47. (In Russian).
7. Maslyaev A.V. Dependence of the citys earthquake protection on the level of responsibility of residential buildings. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost sooruzhenii. 2013. No. 5, pp. 29–32. (In Russian).
8. Ginzburg A.V., Maslyaev A.V. Protection of localites in hazardous natural phenomena is the main purpose of the Russian construction system. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2021. No. 12, pp. 35–44. (In Russian). DOI: https: /doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-12-35-44
9. Maslyaev A.V. About the safety of mass residential and public buildings in Case of dangerous natural influences. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2021. No. 1–2, pp. 40–49. (In Russian). DOI: https:/doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-1-2-40-49
10. Maslyaev A.V. Author’s paradigm of the Russia construction system. Zhilishchnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1–2, pp. 65–71. (In Russian). DOI: https: /doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-65-71
11. Lobastov O.S., Levchenko S.L. Nekotorye zakonomernosti vozniknoveniya i techeniya patologicheskikh reaktsii strakha u lyudei v zhilykh pomeshcheniyakh, okazavshikhsya v raione zemletryaseniya [Some regularities of origin and the course of pathological reactions of fear at people in the premises which appeared around an earthquake]. Leningrad: Voennomeditsinskaya akademiya im. S.M. Kirova. 1983.
12. Alexandrovsky Yu.A. Pogranichnye psikhicheskie rasstroistva: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei [Boundary mental disturbances: A management for doctors]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks. 1997. 576 p.
13. Maslyaev A.V. Seismozashchita zdanii v naselennykh punktakh dlya sokhraneniya zhizni I zdorovya lyudei pri zemletryasenii [Seismic protection of buildings in settlements to preserve the life and health of people during an earthquake. Volgograd: VolgSTU. 2018. 149 p.
14. Vakhov V.P. Mental violations at the serving organized collectives around disasters. Mental disturbances at victims during an earthquake in Armenia. Papers of scientific research institute of general and judicial psychiatry of V.P. Serbsky. 1989, pp. 34–41. (In Russian).
15. Maslyaev A.V. On the need to introduce the requirements of the Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 384-FZ on the protection of life and health of people in buildings during an earthquake into Federal normative documents. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2014. No. 37 (56), pp. 57–62. (In Russian).
16. Composition of the Build ing Standard Law of Japan. 1987. 29 р.
17. Maslyaev A.V. Substantiation of a matrix model of execution in RF Federal laws and normative documents of construction content. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 11, pp. 41–47. (In Russian).
18. Platonov A.S., Shestoperov G.S., Rogozhin E.A. Utochnenie seismotektonicheskoi obstanovki i seismicheskoe mikroraiorovanie uchastka stroitelstva gorodskogo mosta cherez r. Volgu v Volgograde. Seismotektonicheskie issledovanya [Specification of seismotektonic conditions and seismic microdivizion into districts of a site of building of the city bricige through the river Volga in Volgograde. Seismotectonic researches]. Moscow: CNIIS. 1996. 125 p.